Package selection page

Choose the offer that matches the client, not just the budget.

This page compares the three public sprint offers, the kind of buyer each one fits, and the signals that tell you to move up a tier instead of forcing a weak match.

Open Comparison Open Payment Page

3 live offer tiers
1 best-fit client at a time
0 reason to force bad fit

Offer Comparison

See the difference before you quote.

$299 Workflow Teardown

Best for a founder or operator who mainly needs diagnosis, message clarity, or one narrow directional fix before buying a larger sprint.

$799 Automation Sprint

Best for a buyer with one meaningful commercial choke point who wants the page, flow, and close path tightened fast.

Compare Delivery Models

$1,500 Productized Setup

Best for a team that needs broader packaging, onboarding, SOP, and a more complete setup around the revenue path.

Best-Fit Buyers

Each tier maps to a different client state.

$299 Buyer

Curious but not fully committed. They can name the friction, but still want confidence before buying implementation.

$799 Buyer

Ready to act on one defined bottleneck and wants a sprint that closes the gap between interest and payment.

$1,500 Buyer

Already believes the direction and wants the surrounding setup to feel more complete, reusable, and easier to hand off.

Upgrade Signals

Move up the tier when the ask broadens.

Move From $299 To $799

If the client wants execution, page structure, payment flow, or a clearer close route, the teardown is no longer the right fit.

Move From $799 To $1,500

If the ask includes more packaging, onboarding, SOP, or multiple linked deliverables, the broader setup tier is cleaner.

Split Into Another Sprint

If the buyer keeps adding new bottlenecks, separate them into a second sprint instead of stretching the current one.

Fast Decision Lines

Use short language when the buyer asks which package fits.

Teardown Line

If you mainly want a narrow diagnosis and the best next move, the teardown tier is enough.

Core Sprint Line

If you want one real bottleneck tightened end to end, the core sprint is the better fit.

Broader Setup Line

If you want the surrounding packaging and handoff built out too, the broader setup tier is the cleaner route.